#Os sierra slow install#

The memory bandwidth with multiple cores was boosted to 3.8GB/second, for a score of 3616.

Face detection scored 2682, a 45 point boost. Speech recognition got a score of 2147, processing 18.4 words per second. In multi-core performance, the Mac mini scored 1909, a 238 point difference. Multi-core performance, too, improves in High Sierra compared to SierraД«y way of contrast, the single-core overall score for High Sierra on Gandalf was 1169. Regardless of whether the test was single-core or multi-core, High Sierra provided consistently better performance in the analysis. If you arenвЂ™t quite so interested in exact numbers, feel free to skip ahead to вЂњInterpreting the Benchmarks.вЂќ The Benchmark ResultsДЄs youвЂ™ll see in the charts below, macOS High Sierra performed modestly better in all categories. Now for the scores вЂ“ if youвЂ™re into geekspeak, keep reading the results. Then I downloaded Geekbench again, after the initial time of Spotlight indexing was finished, and ran another series of tests.

#Os sierra slow install#

I didnвЂ™t install any additional software, except for Geekbench 4 in Tryout mode.ДЄfter obtaining the Geekbench 4 results for Sierra, I downloaded and performed a clean install of macOS High Sierra. I performed a clean install of macOS Sierra. Gandalf, my midвЂ“2010 Mac mini, has an Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 processor and 8GB of RAM. The mid-2010 Mac mini isnвЂ™t the pinnacle of computer performance, but it still fares better with High Sierra than the operating systemвЂ™s predecessor Testing High Sierra on Older Macs